Recent

Author Topic: Syntax proposals  (Read 13083 times)

marcov

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 11447
  • FPC developer.
Re: Syntax proposals
« Reply #45 on: December 24, 2018, 07:05:07 pm »

I understand, agree and respect this point. Realiability, efficient generated code and safe changing is a must in a big, successful and long term compiler. I only tried to say that, without crossing these red lines, i think there could be some room for advancing. And i would repeat my first question: is there *here* a specific compiler evolution forum to exchange ideas? (not needed a dev forum to make devs  losing their time with user low matured ideas)

I don't know anything specific for Pascal, on this forum or otherwise for such far-out features. General language discussion seems to be in the newsgroup "comp.lang.misc", reachable via google groups.

Blaazen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3237
  • POKE 54296,15
    • Eye-Candy Controls
Re: Syntax proposals
« Reply #46 on: December 24, 2018, 07:56:10 pm »
Lazarus 2.3.0 (rev main-2_3-2863...) FPC 3.3.1 x86_64-linux-qt Chakra, Qt 4.8.7/5.13.2, Plasma 5.17.3
Lazarus 1.8.2 r57369 FPC 3.0.4 i386-win32-win32/win64 Wine 3.21

Try Eye-Candy Controls: https://sourceforge.net/projects/eccontrols/files/

damieiro

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 200
Re: Syntax proposals
« Reply #47 on: January 03, 2019, 08:48:25 am »
Ok, i will explore these two (Google and freepascalwiki).

@Nuño: Ok. I undestand now what you were saying :)

 

TinyPortal © 2005-2018